Comments on: Your answer is…

By: Ick

Ick — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:09:46 +0000

Hey Liverdamage..

I AGREE COMPLETELY!!!!
Icks last blog post..Your answer is…

By: Irish eyes

Irish eyes — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:16:35 +0000

Good q, lads. Why is there no playoff?

By: Liverdamage

Liverdamage — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:56:00 +0000

Who said I’m a horns fan? I openly admit I’m not one. My father is a horns fan, and therefore I have the slightest rooting interest in them.

I’m a football fan… and watching to see if generic-top-level-contender beats the spread vs generic-scrub-team, week after week, year after year, is extremely boring. It’s like watching a 50$ boxing ppv where a heavyweight champion beats up a tomato can. I know there are upsets (and they are great when they do happen), but there are maybe 5 great on-paper nonconference games, league wide, in any given season.

I’ll go ahead and appropriately redirect your jab at the Texas faithful though:
Hey Ick, Bug says “YOUR FOOTBALL TEAM SUCKS…
YOUR QB IS HIGHLY OVERRATED…
YOUR OFFENSIVE COORDINATOR WOULD BE BETTER SERVED PICKING OUT PLAYS FROM MADDEN 09 AT RANDOM…
YOUR ONLY GOOD QB IN DECADES IS A NUTCASE BUST AT THE NFL LEVEL…
YOUR FELLOW FANS ARE REDNECKS…
THE MASCOT IS TASTY…
THE TEXAS O-LINE HAD TO WIKIPEDIA WHAT A BLOCK WAS…
TEXAS DEFENSE CONSISTS OF A BUNCH OF ARM-TACKLING SISSIES…”
(No post should dilute Texas-OU e-hate in any way, shape, or form.)

By: Bug

Bug — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:00:17 +0000

Of course a Horns fan doesn’t care about championships! No Longhorn fan, coach, player, admin seems to.

Let’s count their Big XII championships.
1, uh, er, hmmm… 1

By: Liverdamage

Liverdamage — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:57:32 +0000

I really could care less about the who gets the title. I just want to see good teams play each other. Good teams simply won’t schedule competitive out of conference teams on a regular basis.

For example: until the Texas/Michigan Rose Bowl a few years ago, these teams had never played each other… and that’s a damn shame.

If I were bitching about it instead of requesting more “must see” games, I would have left the “e” off “shame” in that last sentence.

By: Wake Fan

Wake Fan — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:35:48 +0000

Already with the bitching. Every year some little sister complains about not getting in the March brackets. 16 teams would go on too long. An 8 team playoff would last a month. The same month that goes from the last game of the season to Jan bowls. Makes too much sense.

By: Liverdamage

Liverdamage — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:06:41 +0000

I just want to see the good teams actually play each other. I’d prefer a 16 team playoff myself.

By: SCJim

SCJim — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:41:10 +0000

That would do it. Finally we agree.

By: The Dragon

The Dragon — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:17:34 +0000

This will never work and here’s why:
1. It makes way too much sense…
2. There aren’t enough suitcases to fit all of the money in that a playoff would generate…
3. Auburn would not be able to bitch about being left out of the championship game…
4. It would take away all the mythical Nat’l Championships that Alabama could claim. No more 1923 Rexall Drugs Nat’l Champs, 1946 Planter’s Peanut Nat’l Champs, etc. (you know, they have 6 but claim 167)…
5. USC would have to play more than one hard game a year, and we can’t allow that…
6. Texas might have to play a non-conference game against an out-of-state team and everyone outside of Texas knows the real words to the little railroad song they sing; and…
7. It would give Oklahoma 5 or 6 more opportunities to lose a post-season game by a ridiculous margin each year.

The Dragons last blog post..Vince Young Keeps Tradition in Titans Win